Proyecto X , responsabilidades y responsables
- Obtener vínculo
- X
- Correo electrónico
- Otras apps
Piden citar a Garré al Congreso por el espionaje de Gendarmería
Diputados de diferentes bloques opositores se sumaron a la iniciativa. El jefe de esa fuerza reconoció la existencia del "Proyecto X", una base de datos de dirigentes sociales. También, que efectivos realizan tareas de civil para obtener datos. La ministra de Seguridad, por Twitter, descalificó las críticas. Pero evitó pronunciarse sobre la cuestión de fondo.
El informe de A Dos Voces. (TN)
Diputados de diferentes bloques pidieron hoy citar a la ministra de Seguridad Nilda Garré e interpelarla en el marco de la Comisión de Seguridad de la Cámara de Diputados de la Nación sobre las tareas de espionaje internollevadas a cabo por la Gendarmería Nacional en el marco del Proyecto X, tal como ya reconoció el titular de esa fuerza. La existencia del Proyecto X tomó estado público con un informe presentado anoche en TN.
La iniciativa de la diputada Patricia Bullrich (Unión por Todos) fue suscripta por diputados de la UCR, Pro, Gen, Frente Peronista y Socialista del MIJD. Entre otras cosas, piden saber cuándo fue creado el Proyecto X, qué unidades y/o organismos de esa fuerza están afectados y quién decidió darle carácter secreto.
"En el marco de este programa, se sabe que la Gendarmería se infiltró entre los manifestantes en la "causa Kraft", en la que 40 trabajadores fueron procesados en el fueropenal. El Estado de Derecho presupone utilizar herramientas lícitas sean cuales sean las circunstancias", rechaza el proyecto.
Y destaca que según la ley 25.520, que "ningún organismo de inteligencia podrá realizar tareas represivas, poseer facultades compulsivas, cumplir, por sí, funciones policiales ni de investigación criminal, salvo ante requerimiento específico realizado por autoridad judicial competente en el marco de una causa concreta sometida a su jurisdicción, o que se encuentre, para ello, autorizado por ley".
Hasta ahora ningún funcionario del Ministerio de Seguridad habló sobre el "Proyecto X", la base de datos sobre dirigentes sociales que el titular de la Gendarmería, Héctor Schenone, reconoció ante la Justicia y en el marco de la cuál efectivos de esa fuerza realizaban tareas de espionaje vestidos de civil. La ministra Nilda Garré, a través de Twitter, descalificó las críticas. Pero evitó pronunciarse sobre la cuestión de fondo.
La existencia de ese programa secreto para espiar a obreros y dirigentes sociales, que vulnera la Ley de Inteligencia Nacional, fue reconocida por el propio Schenone en un escrito que le envió a la Justicia en el marco de la causa 14.966/2011, caratulada "Gendarmería Nacional s/delito de acción pública c/Hermosilla, Dario Javier y otros".
"Hay que investigar las responsabilidades técnicas en la Gendarmería y también las políticas. En esto debería intervenir la Justicia, pero estando Oyarbide al frente de la causa es una garantía de que no va a pasar nada", destacó el diputado Jorge Triaca (Pro), uno de los se sumó al proyecto de Bullrich.
Por su parte, Eduardo Amadeo (Frente Peronista), dijo que "el Gobierno ya no puede ocultar su profundo autoritarismo". "El reiterado intento por silenciar a los medios, y el espionaje a opositores, son dos caras de un proyecto cada vez menos democrático", agregó.
En el texto remitido a la Justicia, Schenone admite que Gendarmería tiene un programa que tiene como objetivo obtener información personal, creencias, movimientos bancarios y direcciones de líderes de movimientos sociales y gremiales. La causa tomó el nombre de Darío Javier Hermosilla, quien fue delegado sindical y formó parte de las protestas contra la empresa Kraft Food en 2007 a la que le reclamaban mejoras salariales y la reincorporación de trabajadores despedidos. Efectivos de la Gendarmería Nacional y la Policía Federal fueron desplegados en aquel entonces para evitar el corte que realizaban en la Panamericana.
La difusión del documento se hizo anoche en el programa "A Dos Voces", que también mostró videos de cámaras ocultas que dejaban ver cómo efectivos de la Gendarmería intentan hacerse pasar por periodistas para obtener información. El protocolo que regula el funcionamiento del "Proyecto X" prevé el almacenamiento de datos inmobiliarios, recursos financieros o bancarios; documentación personal y hasta detalles de índole privada, como por ejemplo si el investigado bebe alcohol.
Nota del posteo
En la mente de los gobiernos totalitarios, esto esta bien. Sin control legislativo de diputados y senadores , quienes se declaran sorprendidos, evitan el control del pueblo y de las provincias. Sirve a los intereses exclusivos del poder ejecutivo. La intervencion judicial se vuelve a dar en el mismo juez federal de siempre. Descuidan las fronteras, haciendolas mas permeables al narcotrafico , para emplear la GN en tareas que le son ajenas , concentrandola en nucleos urbanos , para lo cual no fueron creadas ni disenadas. Es un seguimiento ilegal e ilegitimo de ciudadanos, hecho a espaldas del pueblo y de sus representantes. Queres algo mas? En un pais civilazado costaria la cabeza de ministros y jefes de la fuerza y ademas del proceso judicial, una comision investigadora. Estamos en la barbarie y en la impunidad total. El gobierno sabe que no va a ser juzgado ni va a responder por esto. Nadie lo hizo antes ni lo van a hacer ahora.
Ademas me pregunto, si a la ultima dictadura militar se le ha tipificado el uso del aparato del Estado para enmarcar al "terrorismo de Estado", cual entonces es la diferencia de usar al Estado para hacer un libro negro de Dona Petrona para uso exclusivo del Poder Ejecutivo. No era que estabamos en democracia? O es una figura aplicable cuando conviene?
Representatives of different block quote today asked the Minister Nilda Garre and interpelarla Security under the Security Commission of the Chamber of Deputies on spying internollevadas out by the National Gendarmerie in the framework of Project X , as was recognized by the holder of that force. The existence of Project X became public with a report presented last night in TN.
The initiative of Deputy Patricia Bullrich (Union for All) was signed by members of the UCR, Pro, Gen, and Socialist Front MIJD Peronist. Among other things, demand to know when it was created Project X, which units and / or agencies that force are affected and who decided to give him secret.
"Under this program, we know that the gendarmerie was infiltrated among the demonstrators at the" cause Kraft ", in which 40 workers were indicted in fueropenal. The rule of law presupposes lawful use tools whatever the circumstances" rejects the project.
And points out that by law 25,520, that "no intelligence organization can do things repressive powers possess compulsory, fulfill, yes, police functions or criminal investigation, unless specifically required to by competent judicial authority in the context of a case concrete under its jurisdiction, or that is for this purpose authorized by law. "
So far no Security Ministry official spoke on "Project X", the database community leaders that the holder of the Gendarmerie, Hector Schenone, acknowledged before the court and under the effect of that force which performed tasksplainclothes intelligence. The Minister Nilda Garre, via Twitter, dismissed the criticism. But avoided ruling on the merits.
The existence of the secret program to spy on workers and community leaders, which violates the Law of National Intelligence, was recognized by Schenone himself in a letter he sent to Justice in connection with the case 14.966/2011, named "Gendarmerie s national / crime against public order c / Hermosilla, Javier Dario and others. "
"We have to investigate the technical responsibilities in the Gendarmerie and policies. In this Justice should intervene, but being Oyarbide leading the cause is a guarantee that is not going to happen," said Deputy Jorge Triaca (Pro) One of the project joined the Bullrich.
For his part, Eduardo Amadeo (Peronist Front), said "the government can no longer hide his deep authoritarianism." "The repeated attempts to silence the media, and spying on opponents, are two sides of an increasingly democratic project," he added.
In the text referred to the Justice admits Schenone Gendarmerie has a program that aims to obtain personal information, beliefs, banking, and addresses of leaders of social movements and unions. The cause was renamed Dario Javier Hermosilla, who was steward and was part of protests against the company Kraft Foods in 2007 that claimed the higher wages and the reinstatement of dismissed workers.Troops of the National Gendarmerie and the Federal Police were deployed at that time to avoid cutting performed on the Panamericana.
The dissemination of the document was made last night on "The Two Voices," which also showed videos of hidden cameras that showed how members of the Gendarmerie try to pose as journalists for information. The protocol governing the operation of "Project X" provides data storage real estate, finance or banking, personal documents and even details of a private nature, such as whether the investigated drink alcohol.
Note the posting
In the minds of totalitarian governments, that's fine. Without legislative oversight of deputies and senators, who are declared surprised, prevent and control the people of the provinces. Serves the exclusive interests of the executive. The judicial intervention gives again the same federal judge ever. They neglect the borders, making them more permeable to drug trafficking, to use the GN in tasks that are outside, concentrating in urban cores, for which were not created or designed. It is illegal and illegitimate track of citizens, made behind the people and their representatives. Want something more? In a country civilazado would cost the head of ministers and heads of force and also the judicial process, a commission of inquiry. We are in barbarism and in total impunity. The government knows it will not be judged or going to answer for this. Nobody did it before or they will do now.
Also I wonder if the last military dictatorship has been established using the state apparatus to frame the "state terrorism", what then is the difference of using the state to make a black book of Dona Petrona for the exclusive use of Executive. Not that we were in a democracy? Or is a figure applicable when it suits?
The initiative of Deputy Patricia Bullrich (Union for All) was signed by members of the UCR, Pro, Gen, and Socialist Front MIJD Peronist. Among other things, demand to know when it was created Project X, which units and / or agencies that force are affected and who decided to give him secret.
"Under this program, we know that the gendarmerie was infiltrated among the demonstrators at the" cause Kraft ", in which 40 workers were indicted in fueropenal. The rule of law presupposes lawful use tools whatever the circumstances" rejects the project.
And points out that by law 25,520, that "no intelligence organization can do things repressive powers possess compulsory, fulfill, yes, police functions or criminal investigation, unless specifically required to by competent judicial authority in the context of a case concrete under its jurisdiction, or that is for this purpose authorized by law. "
So far no Security Ministry official spoke on "Project X", the database community leaders that the holder of the Gendarmerie, Hector Schenone, acknowledged before the court and under the effect of that force which performed tasksplainclothes intelligence. The Minister Nilda Garre, via Twitter, dismissed the criticism. But avoided ruling on the merits.
The existence of the secret program to spy on workers and community leaders, which violates the Law of National Intelligence, was recognized by Schenone himself in a letter he sent to Justice in connection with the case 14.966/2011, named "Gendarmerie s national / crime against public order c / Hermosilla, Javier Dario and others. "
"We have to investigate the technical responsibilities in the Gendarmerie and policies. In this Justice should intervene, but being Oyarbide leading the cause is a guarantee that is not going to happen," said Deputy Jorge Triaca (Pro) One of the project joined the Bullrich.
For his part, Eduardo Amadeo (Peronist Front), said "the government can no longer hide his deep authoritarianism." "The repeated attempts to silence the media, and spying on opponents, are two sides of an increasingly democratic project," he added.
In the text referred to the Justice admits Schenone Gendarmerie has a program that aims to obtain personal information, beliefs, banking, and addresses of leaders of social movements and unions. The cause was renamed Dario Javier Hermosilla, who was steward and was part of protests against the company Kraft Foods in 2007 that claimed the higher wages and the reinstatement of dismissed workers.Troops of the National Gendarmerie and the Federal Police were deployed at that time to avoid cutting performed on the Panamericana.
The dissemination of the document was made last night on "The Two Voices," which also showed videos of hidden cameras that showed how members of the Gendarmerie try to pose as journalists for information. The protocol governing the operation of "Project X" provides data storage real estate, finance or banking, personal documents and even details of a private nature, such as whether the investigated drink alcohol.
Note the posting
In the minds of totalitarian governments, that's fine. Without legislative oversight of deputies and senators, who are declared surprised, prevent and control the people of the provinces. Serves the exclusive interests of the executive. The judicial intervention gives again the same federal judge ever. They neglect the borders, making them more permeable to drug trafficking, to use the GN in tasks that are outside, concentrating in urban cores, for which were not created or designed. It is illegal and illegitimate track of citizens, made behind the people and their representatives. Want something more? In a country civilazado would cost the head of ministers and heads of force and also the judicial process, a commission of inquiry. We are in barbarism and in total impunity. The government knows it will not be judged or going to answer for this. Nobody did it before or they will do now.
Also I wonder if the last military dictatorship has been established using the state apparatus to frame the "state terrorism", what then is the difference of using the state to make a black book of Dona Petrona for the exclusive use of Executive. Not that we were in a democracy? Or is a figure applicable when it suits?
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario