La "filosofía del lenguaje" K (Spanish and English)
La "filosofía del lenguaje" K
Hace pocos días, un amigo (joven, pero no kirchnerista) me envió el enlace a un fragmento de discurso presidencial. Lo acompañaba sólo con un adjetivo entre irónico y escandalizado: "Dantesco". Quiero compartir ese enlace: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=&feature=player_embedded.
Son tres minutos sobre los subtes. Tiene razón la Presidenta cuando afirma que el traspaso de los subtes no hubiera debido ser judicializado por Macri. Tiene razón al señalar que otras medidas cautelares se interpusieron ante resoluciones de gobierno y leyes votadas en el Congreso, como si la Argentina tuviera en su horizonte una república de jueces. Es diferente recurrir a la Corte por la inconstitucionalidad de un fallo que atiborrar los tribunales de medidas cautelares.
Además de estas observaciones, la Presidenta no puede evitar las notas de color, que usa cada vez con más desparpajo, con la creencia de que nadie está a su altura para discutirle y que nadie tiene legitimidad para hacerlo. Salvo los medios, pero ya se sabe qué son los medios: una fachada de negocios mal habidos, tan distintos de los empresarios amigos, esos verdaderos capitalistas de riesgo que juegan sus fortunas en las empresas para dinamizar el mercado de trabajo. Y, para peor, ahora han aparecido, según la Presidenta acaba de revelarnos en un sagaz giro hermenéutico, un par de periodistas filonazis.
En el video que comento, la Presidenta recurrió a un hit del federalismo antiporteño: los argentinos no tienen que pagarle a Buenos Aires sus lujos. Lo que dice Cristina Kirchner instala una revulsiva simetría con las afirmaciones de Macri de que a los hospitales porteños viene a tratarse la gente del Gran Buenos Aires, o que el Indoamericano estaba lleno de extranjeros. Por un lado, federalismo trucho; por el otro, bajo tenor social. Que Macri sea espontáneamente poco sensible a los pobres no habilita a la Presidenta para salir a dar patadas.
Después de la doctrina antiporteña, la Presidenta, por teleconferencia, se dirige a una mujer en La Quiaca (a la que tutea sin conocer, como lo hacen las señoras acomodadas con los pobres de provincia): "Decime, Salustriana, ¿subiste alguna vez a algún subte?". "Hasta ahora no", responde Salustriana, entre risas y aplausos de los funcionarios de la platea porteña. La Presidenta sigue: "Yo voy a ir a La Quiaca y después te venís conmigo en el Tango 01 y vamos a dar una vuelta en subte". Salustriana: "A nosotros nos hacen falta otras cosas". A la Presidenta también: por ejemplo, dar una vuelta en subte a las nueve de la mañana, con De Vido de acompañante. No tiene la obligación de hacerlo. Pero, entonces, que no diga bravuconadas.
Si se le preguntara a Salustriana: ¿necesita Aerolíneas Argentinas?, también diría que antes precisa otras cosas, por ejemplo un tren eficiente que permita que sus familiares la visiten pagando un pasaje razonable. ¿Por qué Cristina Kirchner no viaja en tren con Salustriana desde La Quiaca, si tal expedición es posible? Interrogada libremente, Salustriana también diría que no necesita que se gaste plata en ese avión presidencial, ni en las visitas de la Presidenta al G20 ni en armar un museo de efemérides en la Casa de Gobierno ni en Artépolis, que Cristina acaba de anunciar. Usar a Salustriana como argumento de cómo debe diseñarse un sistema de transporte (o un proyecto cultural) es un golpe bajo, de populismo demagógico.
Desde la extrema necesidad, todo es prescindible. Por eso, la política tiene en la asignación de recursos una función principal. Sin embargo, nadie discute la asignación de recursos de la Presidenta. Para ella sólo hay vía libre. Y ha encontrado, en estos días, a un inesperado émulo: el gobernador Bonfatti, de Santa Fe, asignó más de cuatrocientos mil pesos para un recital en su provincia. ¿Qué diría la Salustriana del norte santafecino si algún periodista del oficialismo la interrogara?
Salustriana no es libre cuando le contesta a la Presidenta. Su autonomía está sujeta por la necesidad material y por la inconmensurable distancia que la separa de esa señora emperifollada que la interpela por teleconferencia. Claramente, Salustriana necesita servicios diferentes de los de un subte, que sería un artefacto de otro planeta en La Quiaca o en cualquier otra ciudad del mundo de esas dimensiones.
Pero la autonomía de Salustriana está afectada porque no tiene libertad para contestar a la Presidenta de un modo diferente. Ni aunque quisiera hacerlo, ni aunque quisiera decirle que ella tampoco necesita que el Gobierno invierta millones en decorar el edificio de Obras Públicas con un póster gigantesco de Eva Perón, cuya maqueta está detrás de la Presidenta. Salustriana no podría decirlo. Muy pocas personas están en condiciones de refutarle algo, cara a cara, a un presidente. Por eso, un presidente abusa de su poder cuando disimula el lugar del irrefutable. Como Cristina frente a Salustriana, hace un gesto del más tradicional paternalismo.
La Presidenta tiene dos estrategias discursivas: el silencio y el monopolio. Lo que se llama "el relato" depende de estas estrategias y no al revés.
Los acontecimientos que se consideran desfavorables y sobre los que no se tiene preparada una argumentación merecen el silencio. Cristina Kirchner atribuye al lenguaje el poder de producir los acontecimientos. Lo que se nombra, automáticamente, pasa a existir: abracadabra. La palabra "inflación" hace subir los precios. A la inversa, lo que no se nombra no existe. El lenguaje produce la realidad, que puede ser narrada, descripta, aludida, metaforizada. Es decir que no se trata sólo de "relato", como se insiste habitualmente. Hay algo anterior a cualquier relato, una fuerza que funda o destituye la realidad.
Según la filosofía del lenguaje K, la lengua es mágica. Por lo tanto, tiene que ser sólo propiedad de la Presidenta, ya que los poderes de enunciar o silenciar tendrían siempre efectos materiales. El unicato cristinista es, en primer lugar, un unicato de enunciación. Muchas veces me he preguntado por qué razón, ya que ella no habla con el periodismo, no existen emisores del tipo de Alberto Fernández, que cumplían esa función de amistoso off the record hasta 2008. Mi pregunta es irrelevante porque Cristina trajo una novedad: todos los lugares desde donde se habla han colapsado menos uno, el que ella ocupa todos los días, porque esa realidad fundada en el lenguaje corre riesgos en ausencia de su discurso, que es el único que garantiza la existencia. Hasta sacó del Gabinete al chistoso Aníbal Fernández, que reproducía en carbónico los humores presidenciales, porque, al emitir esas reproducciones, no se respetaba el unicato de la enunciación. ¿Quién le conoce la voz a Abal Medina? ¿Quién escuchó alguna vez al taciturno Máximo?
Estas cuestiones discursivas son directamente políticas. La "filosofía del lenguaje" K arma sistema con una concepción del poder unificado; es antipluralista y discrecional. Se puede acordar con muchas medidas tomadas por la Presidenta. Es posible, incluso, coincidir con muchos de sus motivos o diagnósticos. Pero no es posible disentir: toda contradicción es un ataque y todo ataque se personaliza.
Cada vez que alguien recuerda la forma secreta en que Boudou fue elegido vicepresidente, las consecuencias del unicato podrían convertirse en lección práctica sobre las conveniencias de un juego más abierto. Nadie pide que Cristina Kirchner se convierta en una demócrata a la uruguaya. Eso va contra sus reflejos y probablemente también contra un estilo argentino, dado a atropellar, que los votantes no han rechazado últimamente. El unicato lo ejerce una personalidad política autocentrada, desconfiada de cualquier pluralismo, hipersensible a las críticas, renuente al diálogo salvo con sujetos ausentes o en estado de dependencia. Los diferentes relatos pueden cambiar, lo que se mantiene estable es el lugar desde donde Cristina los enuncia. Ese es el núcleo duro e inabordable del poder. Todo lo que queda por hacer es desear que no se equivoque.he "philosophy of language" K
By Beatriz Sarlo | For La Nacion
A few days ago, a friend (young, but Kirchner) sent me a link to a presidential speech fragment. He was accompanied only by an adjective between ironic and outraged, "Dantesque". I want to share this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=&feature=player_embedded.Three minutes on the subway. The President is right when he says that the transfer of the subway should not have been judicialized by Macri. He is right to point out that other precautionary measures were brought before government resolutions and laws passed in Congress, as if Argentina were on the horizon a republic of judges. It's different appeal to the Court for a ruling unconstitutional the courts cram for precautionary measures.In addition to these observations, the President can not avoid the colored notes, which uses more and more savvy, with the belief that no one is at its height to argue that no one has standing to do so. Unless the media, but you know what are the means: a facade of ill-gotten business, as distinct from business friends, those true venture capitalists who play their fortunes in business to streamline the labor market. And worse, have now appeared, according to the President just reveal a keen hermeneutic turn, a couple of journalists nazi.In the video that said, the President turned to a hit antiporteño federalism: the Argentines do not have to pay their luxury Buenos Aires. What it says Cristina Kirchner install a repulsive symmetry Macri claims that locals come to hospitals to treat people in Greater Buenos Aires, or the American Indian was full of foreigners. On the one hand, federalism trucho, on the other, under social meaning. Macri is spontaneously insensitive to the poor does not empower the President to quit kicking.After antiporteña doctrine, the President, by teleconference, goes to a woman in Quiaca (which without knowing first-name basis, as do the wealthy to the poor ladies of province): "Tell me, Salustriana, Did you climb ever some subway? "."Until now," replies Salustriana, between laughter and applause from the audience officials in Buenos Aires. The President continues: "I'm going to La Quiaca and then you come with me on the Tango 01 and going for a ride on the subway." Salustriana: "To us we need other things." The President also: for example, a ride on the subway at nine o'clock, with De Vido companion. You have no obligation to do so. But then do not say bravado.If you were to ask Salustriana: need Aerolineas Argentinas?, Would also need other things than before, for example a train efficient to allow the visit family paying a reasonable fare. Cristina Kirchner Why not travel by train from La Quiaca Salustriana if such issue is that possible? Questioned freely Salustriana also say you do not need to spend money on that Air Force One, or the visits of the President to G20 or build a museum of ephemera in the Government House or Artépolis, today announced that Cristina. Salustriana to use as an argument of how to design a transport system (or a cultural project) is a low blow, demagogic populism.From the extreme necessity, everything is expendable. So the policy is in the allocation of resources a major role. Yet no one discuss the allocation of the President. For her only path clear. And he has found, these days, to an unexpected rival: Governor Bonfatti, Santa Fe, allocated over four hundred thousand dollars for a concert in his province. What would the Northern Santa Fe Salustriana if a journalist of the questioned ruling?Salustriana not free when he answered the President. Their autonomy is subject to material need and the immeasurable distance which separates it from the lady dolled up the challenges by teleconference. Clearly, Salustriana need different services from those of a subway, it would be an artifact from another planet in the Quiaca or any other city of this size.But autonomy is affected because Salustriana not free to answer the President in a different way. Even if I wanted to, even if I wanted to say that she does not need the government to invest millions in decorating the Public Works building with a giant poster of Eva Peron, whose model is behind the President. Salustriana could not say. Very few people are able to refute something, face to face a president. Thus, a president abuses his power when conceals the site of irrefutable. As Cristina Salustriana front, makes a gesture of traditional paternalism.The President has two discursive strategies: silence and monopoly. What is called "the story" depends on these strategies and not vice versa.The events that are considered unfavorable and those not prepared an argument has merit silence. Cristina Kirchner attributed to the language the power to produce events. The appointment automatically comes into existence: abracadabra. The word "inflation" does raise prices. Conversely, it is not named does not exist. Language produces reality, which can be narrated, described, mentioned, metaphorical. That is not just about "story" as it usually insists. There is something prior to any story, a force that builds or removes from reality.According to the philosophy of language K, the language is magical. Therefore, it must be owned only by the President, as the powers to state or mute would always have material effects. The unicato cristinista is, first, a unicato of enunciation. I have often wondered why, since she does not speak with the media, there is no such issuers Alberto Fernandez, who fulfilled that role of friendly off the record until 2008. My question is irrelevant because Cristina brought something new: all the places where you least one talks have collapsed, which she takes every day, because that reality grounded in the language is at risk in the absence of his speech, which is the only ensures the existence.Cabinet took up the humorous Anibal Fernandez, who reproduced in carbon presidential moods, because, in issuing such reproductions are not respected the unicato of enunciation. Who knows the voice Abal Medina? Who ever heard the taciturn Max?These issues are directly political discourse. The "philosophy of language" K weapon system with a unified conception of power, is anti-pluralist and discretionary. You can agree with many measures taken by the President. You may even agree with many of his motives or diagnoses. But you can not disagree: every contradiction is an attack and any attack is customized.Every time someone secretly remembers that Boudou was elected vice president, the consequences of unicato could become practical lesson on the conveniences of a more open game. Nobody asks Cristina Kirchner becomes a Democrat Uruguay. That goes against your reflexes and probably also against Argentine style, as to run over, voters have not rejected recently. The unicato is exercised by a political self-centered, distrustful of any pluralism, hypersensitive to criticism, unwilling to dialogue with subjects unless absent or in a state of dependency. Different stories can change, which is stable is the place where the states Cristina. That is the core power and unapproachable. All that remains is to wish that no mistake.
A few days ago, a friend (young, but Kirchner) sent me a link to a presidential speech fragment. He was accompanied only by an adjective between ironic and outraged, "Dantesque". I want to share this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=&feature=player_embedded.Three minutes on the subway. The President is right when he says that the transfer of the subway should not have been judicialized by Macri. He is right to point out that other precautionary measures were brought before government resolutions and laws passed in Congress, as if Argentina were on the horizon a republic of judges. It's different appeal to the Court for a ruling unconstitutional the courts cram for precautionary measures.In addition to these observations, the President can not avoid the colored notes, which uses more and more savvy, with the belief that no one is at its height to argue that no one has standing to do so. Unless the media, but you know what are the means: a facade of ill-gotten business, as distinct from business friends, those true venture capitalists who play their fortunes in business to streamline the labor market. And worse, have now appeared, according to the President just reveal a keen hermeneutic turn, a couple of journalists nazi.In the video that said, the President turned to a hit antiporteño federalism: the Argentines do not have to pay their luxury Buenos Aires. What it says Cristina Kirchner install a repulsive symmetry Macri claims that locals come to hospitals to treat people in Greater Buenos Aires, or the American Indian was full of foreigners. On the one hand, federalism trucho, on the other, under social meaning. Macri is spontaneously insensitive to the poor does not empower the President to quit kicking.After antiporteña doctrine, the President, by teleconference, goes to a woman in Quiaca (which without knowing first-name basis, as do the wealthy to the poor ladies of province): "Tell me, Salustriana, Did you climb ever some subway? "."Until now," replies Salustriana, between laughter and applause from the audience officials in Buenos Aires. The President continues: "I'm going to La Quiaca and then you come with me on the Tango 01 and going for a ride on the subway." Salustriana: "To us we need other things." The President also: for example, a ride on the subway at nine o'clock, with De Vido companion. You have no obligation to do so. But then do not say bravado.If you were to ask Salustriana: need Aerolineas Argentinas?, Would also need other things than before, for example a train efficient to allow the visit family paying a reasonable fare. Cristina Kirchner Why not travel by train from La Quiaca Salustriana if such issue is that possible? Questioned freely Salustriana also say you do not need to spend money on that Air Force One, or the visits of the President to G20 or build a museum of ephemera in the Government House or Artépolis, today announced that Cristina. Salustriana to use as an argument of how to design a transport system (or a cultural project) is a low blow, demagogic populism.From the extreme necessity, everything is expendable. So the policy is in the allocation of resources a major role. Yet no one discuss the allocation of the President. For her only path clear. And he has found, these days, to an unexpected rival: Governor Bonfatti, Santa Fe, allocated over four hundred thousand dollars for a concert in his province. What would the Northern Santa Fe Salustriana if a journalist of the questioned ruling?Salustriana not free when he answered the President. Their autonomy is subject to material need and the immeasurable distance which separates it from the lady dolled up the challenges by teleconference. Clearly, Salustriana need different services from those of a subway, it would be an artifact from another planet in the Quiaca or any other city of this size.But autonomy is affected because Salustriana not free to answer the President in a different way. Even if I wanted to, even if I wanted to say that she does not need the government to invest millions in decorating the Public Works building with a giant poster of Eva Peron, whose model is behind the President. Salustriana could not say. Very few people are able to refute something, face to face a president. Thus, a president abuses his power when conceals the site of irrefutable. As Cristina Salustriana front, makes a gesture of traditional paternalism.The President has two discursive strategies: silence and monopoly. What is called "the story" depends on these strategies and not vice versa.The events that are considered unfavorable and those not prepared an argument has merit silence. Cristina Kirchner attributed to the language the power to produce events. The appointment automatically comes into existence: abracadabra. The word "inflation" does raise prices. Conversely, it is not named does not exist. Language produces reality, which can be narrated, described, mentioned, metaphorical. That is not just about "story" as it usually insists. There is something prior to any story, a force that builds or removes from reality.According to the philosophy of language K, the language is magical. Therefore, it must be owned only by the President, as the powers to state or mute would always have material effects. The unicato cristinista is, first, a unicato of enunciation. I have often wondered why, since she does not speak with the media, there is no such issuers Alberto Fernandez, who fulfilled that role of friendly off the record until 2008. My question is irrelevant because Cristina brought something new: all the places where you least one talks have collapsed, which she takes every day, because that reality grounded in the language is at risk in the absence of his speech, which is the only ensures the existence.Cabinet took up the humorous Anibal Fernandez, who reproduced in carbon presidential moods, because, in issuing such reproductions are not respected the unicato of enunciation. Who knows the voice Abal Medina? Who ever heard the taciturn Max?These issues are directly political discourse. The "philosophy of language" K weapon system with a unified conception of power, is anti-pluralist and discretionary. You can agree with many measures taken by the President. You may even agree with many of his motives or diagnoses. But you can not disagree: every contradiction is an attack and any attack is customized.Every time someone secretly remembers that Boudou was elected vice president, the consequences of unicato could become practical lesson on the conveniences of a more open game. Nobody asks Cristina Kirchner becomes a Democrat Uruguay. That goes against your reflexes and probably also against Argentine style, as to run over, voters have not rejected recently. The unicato is exercised by a political self-centered, distrustful of any pluralism, hypersensitive to criticism, unwilling to dialogue with subjects unless absent or in a state of dependency. Different stories can change, which is stable is the place where the states Cristina. That is the core power and unapproachable. All that remains is to wish that no mistake.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario